Re: Insider - how to use it effectively
Sue King wrote:
> Hi Per,
> I'm working my way through the different components of the Suite. As
> I'm new to all this, I don't understand the significance of all the
> information. I've watched the recording of the Lachlan's Sydney
> presentation, but unfortunately your answers to questions did not get
> When I select viewing Optimization Candidates, which columns are
> important in determining what could be optimized ? I understand
> cyclometric complexity is important, but I don't know which other
> columns give information that might suggest work needs to be done, and
> what sort of values would cause concern.
> Some of the columns I am curious about are Dup Calls, Dependencies,
> Tail Calls.
Some of these view definitions are a bit dated.
"Optimization Candidates" is currently defined as showing the
- there are loops present, and also one of
- word overrides are present (those used to be slow but not so much on
- legacy instructions are present ('loop', BCD instructions, et al)
- there are more than 32 direct references (sub-routine call sites)
- there are more than 16 indirect references (virtual method call sites)
- there are value copies (i.e. non-const parameters of non trivial size)
- there are indirect variable references (i.e. all references to a
particular variable immediately follow a pointer within what the first
variable points to (slow))
- there are more than 4 inside stack references (i.e. locals that did
not fit in available registers)
- there are more than 4 outside stack references (i.e. parameters that
did not fit in available registers)
- there are more than 50 dependencies (i.e. more than 50 case of read
or write contention a.k.a. back-to-back instructions that read to or
write from the same register(s), which can cause stalls).
Like cyclomatic complexity, many of these metrics have to do with
general code complexity. The more complex a routine is, the less
efficient it tends to be (not to mention harder to understand for
"Dup calls" is a rough measure of how much code appears to do roughly
the same work. This can sometimes be optimized by lifting the common
logic into a separate helper routine.
Tail calls are Call instructions immediately followed by a Ret
instructions - those can be pulled together in a Jmp instruction but
only if you are coding at the asm level, of course. I am not even sure
this optimization is such a great idea anymore with the call/return
history that CPUs maintain nowadays.
Note generally that there's a popup hint on every column in the view
header that attempts to give a brief description.